Just last month Twitter was forced to pull tweets which included anti-jewish jokes following legal threats from the French Jewish Students Union, according to AFP. They also pulled hashtags which were deemed anti-Jewish such as #unbonjuif (agoodjew). Apparently it is against the law in France to make anti-semitic jokes. That is the consensus of the news stories across the internet.
And yet ...
Only the previous month a French magazine, in an action which was much more publicly inflammatory and anti-semitic, produced a series of cartoons insulting to Muslims. What was response to that? Police went to guard the magazine offices. Not to raid them, not to issue an injunction, but to protect them.
Seems to me a plausible case of outrageous hypocrisy. Yet it would be unfair to blame the French for being two-faced hypocrites when it comes to Muslims. The response to the two issues was pretty much the same in most of the English-speaking media. In the first case there was a staunch defense of free speech; in the second case, no defense at all.
Surely you think; with the wealth of media commentary available on such a topical issue, some official media outlet has pointed out this obvious fact? Not one. Not one media commentator has made the obvious comparison between the two cases. Not even to disagree with my conclusion. This is what we have nowadays with our super-free 24/7 internet enabled media world. A uniformity, a closed mindset, a lack of analysis and evaluation, that would sit comfortably with the great days of 1950s Soviet journalism.
And with a media that crap, we are hardly likely to see a ripple in the public discourse in Europe, which will continue to be utterly hypocritical and anti-muslim.